Logo

Why did Amazon initially deny leave of absence to Alexis Scott-Windham, the Amazon worker who survived the New Orleans terrorist attack?

Last Updated: 17.06.2025 00:20

Why did Amazon initially deny leave of absence to Alexis Scott-Windham, the Amazon worker who survived the New Orleans terrorist attack?

Source: Amazon Reverses Time Off Denial For Employee Injured In New Orleans Attack

I still can't believe someone denied the request and didn't consider this. Which basically proves Amazon doesn’t care about their workforce, not even when runover and shot. HR over there must stand for Heartless Robots. Either way, I loathe this company. Everything I learn about them tells me its business practices are unethical and exploitative, a whisker away from modern slavery and that’s because lawmakers didn’t want to upset the billionaire in charge.

My guess is greed and cruelty but, thankfully, after public outrage, Amazon folded faster than their delivery drivers under holiday quotas. Hence, they backtracked and gave her paid leave. All it took was bad press to show a little compassion. But basic decency shouldn’t require a social media outcry. Imagine surviving a traumatizing terror attack and your reward is fighting Bezos’ HR team like it’s Mortal Kombat.

I’m wondering about attachment and transference with the therapist and the idea of escape and fantasy? How much do you think your strong feelings, constant thoughts, desires to be with your therapist are a way to escape from your present life? I wonder if the transference serves another purpose than to show us our wounds and/or past experiences, but is a present coping strategy for managing what we don’t want to face (even if unconsciously) in the present—-current relationships, life circumstances, etc. Can anyone relate to this concept of escape in relation to their therapy relationship? How does this play out for you?

That’s why these billionaires like Bezos, Musk, Zuckerberg and others are showing their true colors now Trump is in charge. Capitalism at its ugliest and the clearest sign that unions are critical.